You wish to receive more spam - demand from the spamer to stop dispatch

Canadian company Vircom investigated, as various answers to spam messages - from a clique on the reference in the spam letter to the aggressive message to spamers influence volume of the spam received by not protected users.
During half a year Vircom which is engaged in system engineering of safety of e-mail, carried out monitoring of thousand mail boxes. That the positive answer to the spam letter is true way to "light" the address and to undergo to the further attacks of spamers - well-known. Researchers from Vircom were amazed with that fact, that aggressive rebuffs to spamers lead to similar result. After the user sends to the spamer the requirement to stop dispatch, the spam volume increases in its mail box on 300 %!
Vircom gives some simple recommendations, carrying out which it is possible to leave from under a sight of spamers:

• Never to answer a spam;
  
• Never to t... Read more »

Antispam - decisions

Why a spam - threat for business?
The reason of explosive growth of spams-dispatches that dispatch practically is possible to the spamer, but costs much to all the rest: both to the addressee of a spam, and its provider. Spams-messages try to be as much as possible similar to normal mail - that them read.

Than the spam is harmful:
Fall of productivity of the company.
Casual loss of the important messages at manual cleaning of e-mail.
Threat of stability of work of post servers.
The dangerous maintenance: viruses, the forbidden materials.
Now approximately 75-80 % of entering messages - a spam. It means, that your post service spends three quarters of the disk space and processor capacity now for service of business of spamers!
The parasitic traffic.
For providers - expenses for a support service, conflicts to clients.
Thus, the spam bears considerable risks for business as comp... Read more »